Archive

Posts Tagged ‘marijuana’

Rolling Back Anti-Pot Laws

October 19th, 2009

Obama’s DOJ just made it official: they will not go after people using medical marijuana under the protection of state law.

Two Justice Department officials described the new policy to The Associated Press, saying prosecutors will be told it is not a good use of their time to arrest people who use or provide medical marijuana in strict compliance with state laws.

The new policy is a significant departure from the Bush administration, which insisted it would continue to enforce federal anti-pot laws regardless of state codes.

Of course this provides no relief for our friend Dave, who is still caught up in the dragnet. But it is progress for legalization advocates, even if this sort of policy can just as quickly be rescinded by the next administration. If pot activists use the next few years to pass more state laws and open more dispensaries, however, it will be harder in the future to re-introduce full prohibition.

In the News , , ,

The Legal Wrap

September 18th, 2009

Our session on the morality of legislating behavior rambled at times, but produced a lively conversation, and I think we all took something from it. The Junta would like to thank Dave for sharing his personal episode of confrontation with the war on drugs. It was powerful to hear a man speak openly about a situation in which he is most certainly going to jail.

The gravity of Dave’s position naturally occupied our attention for the majority of the session. He was arrested with over 30 pounds of marijuana hidden in a rental car he was driving across the country. The D.A. offered him 12 years but he thinks it’s more likely he’ll do 2 or 3. He has a surprisingly upbeat attitude about it, and mentioned twice his interest in training to be a mechanic while in the joint.

Dave’s defense, such as it is, relies on a series of steps in which he contends his rights were violated. He was first pulled over for speeding, though he was certain he wasn’t speeding at all. The officer asked him to sit in the squad car while he wrote out the ticket. Dave’s first mistake was acceding to this bizarre request.

As he wrote out the ticket, the officer said he thought Dave was nervous, and he wanted permission to search the car. Dave refused, and so the cop called in the canine unit. The dog did four laps around the car, sniffing it out, and somehow did not alert, and so Dave was allowed to go.

Two states later he was pulled over again, this time accused of passing another vehicle without signaling – again, something Dave denies doing. They called in another dog, for some reason, and found the weed. Busted.

What was the reason Dave was pulled over twice and both times a dog was called to sniff his car for drugs? According to Dave: profiling.

Not the Driving While Black that Obama has spoken of – Dave is white – but the fact that he was a single guy with way-out-of-state plates driving on a major highway through the flatlands, at night.

In the course of researching his defense, Dave came across a commercial website operated by a police officer, aimed at other police officers. It sold a video how-to guide for making major drug busts.

“Are you envious of the officers in your precinct taking down the big criminals and getting big promotions?’ the sales-cop asked.

He mentioned the federal budget, and the competition among state and local police and other emergency forces for money from Washington. “All of that funding escalated immensely after 9/11, and now it has to be justified.”

Civil Liberties

The loss of individual rights was a strong thread throughout the discussion, with Dave citing several court decisions that affect his case, including:

  • Illinois v Caballes – Here the court ruled that a drug dog alerting on a car constitutes probable cause to search the car, even if there was no probable cause to use the dog in the first place. Or, as this blog puts it, “the total decision as to whether there was sufficient reason for a search was to be determined by a dog anxious to please his or her law enforcement master.”
  • Arizona v Gant – This essentially said that if you get arrested while driving, or while near your car, police may search the car without a warrant.

Here the discussion prompted an animated argument from Tim, who contended that a certain population of law enforcement personal have been so effectively “programmed” to bust people for weed, that they cannot comprehend the case for legalization or decriminalization. In his view, this kind of cop is little more than a tool of society’s master planners, a “brain dead” individual who does not think for himself but merely relies on his institutional training for all decision-making. Or, as Ice-T Ice Cube once put it, “Fuck the po-lice!”

The burgeoning prison population in this country is largely a result of increased incarceration of drug offenders. An interesting facet of this is that prisoners cannot vote, yet they count as population in the area where they are incarcerated, skewing the congressional numbers and providing a perverse incentive for states to build prisons.

However, the rising costs of housing prisoners has led to several changes. One is the increasing privatization of the industry, where states outsource the building, running and maintaining of prisons to powerful corporate donors. Another is plans to release prisoners due to the overwhelming costs of housing them.

The media play into the scenario by sensationalizing crime and police work. MSNBC’s “To Catch a Predator” lures paedophiles to hotel rooms by posing on the internet as children. When the targets show up expecting a minor, they are faced with TV personality Dan Hansen and a host of lights and cameras. The show’s webpage invites you to “meet the men of ‘To Catch a Predator’”, and reminds us today not to miss the 2-hour premiere…

The obvious contradiction between legal and illegal drugs was mentioned, and needs no further comment here except to say that while booze and tobacco kill way more people than weed, this line of logic gets dicier when you get to heroin and methamphetamine. Those looking to expand their repertoire of legal highs are advised to study salvia divinorum.

We gravitated back to Dave and his predicament, concentrating on jail. Those who do time in Texas have “Felon” permanently stamped on their ID cards, which makes it tough to get a job later. The cruelty of this scarlett letter is made worse by the knowledge that even those who exonerate themselves, who have been proved innocent by DNA evidence while serving long sentences, still have “Felon” on their driver’s license. Meanwhile, they are even worse off than released felons who were actually guilty because, having had their records cleared (except for their IDs), they are no longer eligible for post-prison services offered by the state.

One participant boiled down the war on drugs to the following: domestically, it means aggresively incarcerating the population (and mostly the underclass); overseas, it means funding the slaughter of peasants. See Colombia.

At some point, human beings ought to be responsible for taking care of themselves, even if we need to collectively protect those who can’t protect themselves.

Announcements, Wrap-Ups , , ,

Vice, Morality, and the Law

August 18th, 2009

Wed. Sept, 9, 2009, The Larry Lawrence Bar, 295 Grand St b/t Havemeyer and Roebling, Williamsburg, Brooklyn.

7:30 pm

What should humans be allowed to do, and what should they be prevented from doing? Besides the obvious rule against killing people who piss you off, how far should the law restrict our personal freedoms to drink, use drugs, prostitute ourselves, get married, vote, practice medicine or religion, or any number of things we might come up with?

Legalizing weed is a trending topic. Lots of people use it, despite its being illegal, and there is clearly a profit to be made by regulating and taxing it. But at what cost?

Should tobacco, whose use can be directly linked to over 5 million deaths per year (worldwide; in the US it’s 400,000), be outlawed?

If causing mass death is our gauge, maybe we shouldn’t let so many people drive. Forty thousand Americans die on the road each year.

Of course, we all know that Prohibition didn’t work out too well – but what about the prohibition of heroin? Hasn’t that done us well?

Then there’s religion. Americans used to pray in school, or so I’ve heard, until the Supreme Court said that wasn’t cool. More recently, a federal appeals court ruled that it was totally cool for a guy to sacrifice goats in his house as part of a “complex ritual for ordaining priests”.

What else can you think of – what should be made legal/illegal and why?

UPDATE: Forgot all about prostitution, the top example of an illegal activity that just won’t go away. NPR did a great debate, “Is It Wrong to Pay for Sex?”, which I heartily recommend everyone listen to (about 50min). On a related note, the Economist recently made a case for looser restrictions on how we treat pedophiles (Megan’s laws, sex offender registries).

And organ sales. People need kidneys; other people have kidneys to spare. Should we be selling our organs? The New Yorker did a story on people who felt motivated to donate their kidneys to total strangers, for nothing. There is also an audio interview with the author.

Announcements, Meetings , , , , , ,

Legalize it, September-09

August 9th, 2009

We are going to send a notice around about the next Junta being pushed back till September. I have some travel coming up, and we really want to find a good venue (suggestions very welcome)–we are thinking about Williamsburg for the next one and we’re going to check out some potential spots soon.

There was a small item in the most recent Economist about the legalization issue. It seems that California might be turning to marijuana to help ease its massive budget woes. 80% of voters in Oakland have approved a sales tax on marijuana sales that could bring the state approximately $1.4 billion a year. I say hallelujah, great idea, and suspects others who will come to the next Junta will agree. But we’re still hoping to get some voices that feel otherwise, even if they aren’t strictly against, at least some reservations noted would be worthwhile.

Anyway, hope ya’ll enjoy the rest of the summer.

JH.

Announcements , , ,

Legalize It

July 29th, 2009

I hope you’re having a good summer. Not sure if any of you have been on the junta blog since the last meeting but it features a wrap-up about the democracy meeting and some talk about Uighurs and Chinese oppression.

Towards the end of the last Junta we touched on discussing the idea of legalization at the next meeting. At the moment there seems to be an increasing segment of the population that agrees that marijuana should be legalized. But should the trend stop there? What drugs should be legalized and why? Should prostitution be brought in from the shadowy underworld that it currently exists in? How do we as a society face our vices and what role should government play in legislating morality to us and trying to keep us safe and healthy when it comes to questions that are ultimately about personal liberties. When talking with a few other Junta people it was mentioned that the discussion might be one-sided and that a largely young and liberal crowd would be an echo-chamber for the pro-legalization stance. Since then at least one person, Don Chase, has agreed to take a stab at arguing the other side, at least in a limited way. Any one else feel that they could speak effictively against legalization?

The discussion should be particularly interesting because we are going to be joined by someone caught inside the drug war, specifically on marijuana. This person was caught in a mid-western state with over 30 pounds of marijuana and is now facing serious legal ramifications. He has mounted a defense based on a violation of his civil liberties in terms of unlawful search and seizure, his story is fascinating and will color everyone’s thoughts in terms of law enforcement, how our tax dollars are used, and the penalties against a drug that many feel is less harmful that alcohol.

We are thinking of August 11th or 12th and welcome any feedback about these two dates, as well any other thoughts on the topic. More details soon.

Meetings , , , ,